The ultimate test, it would seem, legal and factual both, lies in the quality of air breathed, in or outside “bubbles”, assuming the purpose of the EPA Act is, as the name suggests, attainment of clean air. “Clean air" is perhaps best defined by living lungs that breathe the air.
The administrative state will continue to increase and the people will continue to decrease. Overturning Chevron may slow the decent but will not stop it.
I would say that, if headed by a unitary and powerful executive, the administrative state can be the means by which the many overcome the power of the few. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4321671
The ultimate test, it would seem, legal and factual both, lies in the quality of air breathed, in or outside “bubbles”, assuming the purpose of the EPA Act is, as the name suggests, attainment of clean air. “Clean air" is perhaps best defined by living lungs that breathe the air.
There is something very troubling about the above statement.
The administrative state will continue to increase and the people will continue to decrease. Overturning Chevron may slow the decent but will not stop it.